{"id":648,"date":"2025-06-06T05:26:01","date_gmt":"2025-06-06T05:26:01","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/tcap.blog\/?p=648"},"modified":"2025-10-01T21:21:05","modified_gmt":"2025-10-01T21:21:05","slug":"cummins-confidential-did-cepac-and-cummins-hire-a-serial-litigator-vs-a-serial-litigator","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/tcap.blog\/2025\/06\/06\/cummins-confidential-did-cepac-and-cummins-hire-a-serial-litigator-vs-a-serial-litigator\/","title":{"rendered":"Cummins Confidential : Did Cepac (and Cummins) Hire a Serial Litigator Vs a “Serial Litigator”?"},"content":{"rendered":"\n
\"\"<\/figure>\n\n\n\n

Wendy Miller KC moves through courtrooms like a quiet shadow, her presence measured, her attire impeccable. Known at St Philips Chambers for unravelling complex criminal matters and high-stakes employment disputes, she has proven her prowess time and again. When Cummins Ltd engaged her to defend against a disability-discrimination claim in the Employment Tribunal, she turned her skills towards a global corporate giant. Now Cepac Ltd has hired her for a similar claim (though this time discrimination in recruitment) against the same individual. This is a study in conscience or its absence.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Punching Down for Cummins<\/strong><\/h2>\n\n\n\n

In the Employment Tribunal, Miller faced Lee Thompson, a former production worker whose complaint was nuanced. He suffered from IBS, depression and anxiety, and argued that Cummins failed to provide reasonable adjustments \u2013 proper workplace support and fair processes \u2013 once his condition became known. Miller ignored inclusion and mental-health impacts and focused solely on procedure. She dismantled Thompson\u2019s case by exploiting technicalities until the tribunal ruled in Cummins\u2019 favour. That decision now sits under appeal in the Employment Appeal Tribunal.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Defending Cummins in this way reveals a moral void. To punch down for a giant corporation with boundless resources against a lone individual struggling with mental health requires a detachment bordering on indifference. Miller showed none.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n\n\n\n

Punching Down Again for Cepac (Upcoming)<\/strong><\/h1>\n\n\n\n

When one believes things could not grow colder, Miller is now representing Cepac Ltd in Thompson\u2019s simultaneous UK discrimination claim. Thompson did not choose this battle; he was trying to move on after Cummins, but Cepac allegedly discriminated against him in recruitment. Cepac\u2019s solicitors received Thompson\u2019s medical files, which referenced an Employment Tribunal claim. From there, they appear to have searched the legal directory and identified Miller\u2019s involvement. She has only so far appeared for Cepac at a preliminary hearing in Thompson\u2019s absence, but when she does it will be the same man \u2013 still dealing with depression, anxiety (now even more deteriorated) and IBS \u2013 standing in her way once more. She will do for Cepac what she did for Cummins: punch down.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Ask yourself, when Miller\u2019s brief was filed against Thompson, did she pause to consider her conscience? There is no indication she did. Cepac labelled Thompson a \u201cserial litigator.\u201d Well, Wendy Miller KC has earned that label many times over. Below are examples of how she defended some of the most heinous crimes imaginable \u2013 each a testament to a conscience put up for sale.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n\n\n\n

Defending Heinous Alleged Crimes<\/strong><\/h2>\n\n\n\n